Idiots in hybrids
Dude, I didn't say not to hold him accountable! [&:]
You said "Removing the accountability from his actions" correct?
You don't even know if he DIDthose actions in the first place. If he did, he is accountable, and nobody is denying it man! How do you knwo he did that in a dangerous and unsafe way?
He said "so i pulled in close thinking he was going to slowly pull up to the white line" and he did this AFTER the guy was already stopped.
SO, he wasn't tailgaiting, and pulling in close COULD mean a normal distance.
You convicted him of an action he never admitted to. You can say he was wrong, but how can you say he was wrong for something you don't even know he did?
Wait until he says "YES I DID FOLLOW TOO CLOSE AND I TAILGATED" before going off on the guy. At least then it would be justified, but snapping on someone for something you don't even know they did isn't right in my book. Wait for him to actually say it before convicting him of doing it.
You said "Removing the accountability from his actions" correct?
You don't even know if he DIDthose actions in the first place. If he did, he is accountable, and nobody is denying it man! How do you knwo he did that in a dangerous and unsafe way?
He said "so i pulled in close thinking he was going to slowly pull up to the white line" and he did this AFTER the guy was already stopped.
SO, he wasn't tailgaiting, and pulling in close COULD mean a normal distance.
You convicted him of an action he never admitted to. You can say he was wrong, but how can you say he was wrong for something you don't even know he did?
Wait until he says "YES I DID FOLLOW TOO CLOSE AND I TAILGATED" before going off on the guy. At least then it would be justified, but snapping on someone for something you don't even know they did isn't right in my book. Wait for him to actually say it before convicting him of doing it.
did you not read my post
i was not tailgating him, he pulled out infront of me then stopped for no reason, so yea i was close at that point, but maybe 3 ft away at minimum, read the post.
i was not tailgating him, he pulled out infront of me then stopped for no reason, so yea i was close at that point, but maybe 3 ft away at minimum, read the post.
ORIGINAL: branstone
did you not read my post
i was not tailgating him, he pulled out infront of me then stopped for no reason, so yea i was close at that point, but maybe 3 ft away at minimum, read the post.
did you not read my post
i was not tailgating him, he pulled out infront of me then stopped for no reason, so yea i was close at that point, but maybe 3 ft away at minimum, read the post.
PLEASE if I'm missing something here, TELL ME lol Seriously
As I said, we are NOW learning what really happened lol. At least wait until we know if he's a guilty man before you ream his *** 
So, how close WERE you to his bumper where he would come out and start yelling at you? Just a rough estimate.
OK Let's get this freakin' story straight.
Hummer is driving down the street. Civic is waiting to pull out on the street from the parking lot.
Civic pulls out of the parking lot right in front of the Hummer and cuts him off.
(now here is the gray area. Did the Civic slam on his brakes immediately, or did B come up on his *** because he was cut off and after time went by the Civic slammed on brakes?)
Civic slams on his brakes for no reason 3 car lenghts before the intersection, and just stops.
Hummer moves in closer.
Civic starts moving again and as soon as Hummer starts moving again, Civic slams on brakes again.
Cycle repeats a couple more times.
IS THIS WHAT HAPPENED OR NO lol
How is this B being wrong? The Civic cut B off and purposely, almost seeming likethe Civictried to get B to hit him. I don't get it dude. How is this B's fault and how is B the one following too close when he was cut off??
I hope this makes you see what I'm getting at? You pointed the finger at him for somethingwedidn't evenknow if he didin the first place! We didn't know the whole story yet.
NOW, if B tailgated the Civic for oh, 30 seconds to a minute AFTER the Civic cut him off, then I would say, yes he was wrong. But we don't know that part, so you can't assume that's what happened!
My point? Maybe a person should wait untilthey get all the facts before telling someone they think they were wrong, because what you have a problem withmay have not evenhappend!!! In that case, you are assuming someone did something they didn't do and coming down on them for something that they didn'tdo.
It's like being convicted of a crime you didn't do, but you are guilty anyway, just because someone thinks you are.
He was cut off! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I need some sleep or something

So, how close WERE you to his bumper where he would come out and start yelling at you? Just a rough estimate.
OK Let's get this freakin' story straight.
Hummer is driving down the street. Civic is waiting to pull out on the street from the parking lot.
Civic pulls out of the parking lot right in front of the Hummer and cuts him off.
(now here is the gray area. Did the Civic slam on his brakes immediately, or did B come up on his *** because he was cut off and after time went by the Civic slammed on brakes?)
Civic slams on his brakes for no reason 3 car lenghts before the intersection, and just stops.
Hummer moves in closer.
Civic starts moving again and as soon as Hummer starts moving again, Civic slams on brakes again.
Cycle repeats a couple more times.
IS THIS WHAT HAPPENED OR NO lol

How is this B being wrong? The Civic cut B off and purposely, almost seeming likethe Civictried to get B to hit him. I don't get it dude. How is this B's fault and how is B the one following too close when he was cut off??
I hope this makes you see what I'm getting at? You pointed the finger at him for somethingwedidn't evenknow if he didin the first place! We didn't know the whole story yet.
NOW, if B tailgated the Civic for oh, 30 seconds to a minute AFTER the Civic cut him off, then I would say, yes he was wrong. But we don't know that part, so you can't assume that's what happened!
My point? Maybe a person should wait untilthey get all the facts before telling someone they think they were wrong, because what you have a problem withmay have not evenhappend!!! In that case, you are assuming someone did something they didn't do and coming down on them for something that they didn'tdo.
It's like being convicted of a crime you didn't do, but you are guilty anyway, just because someone thinks you are.
He was cut off! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I need some sleep or something
As I look back on this, I think to myself, why the hell do I really care? I have better things to worry about 
That's ok. When I'm pulling Nick's H2 out of a mud pit in a few weeks, then we'll see, oh yes, then we will certainly see........ (see what, I really don't know yet, probably stars, er sumthin........)

That's ok. When I'm pulling Nick's H2 out of a mud pit in a few weeks, then we'll see, oh yes, then we will certainly see........ (see what, I really don't know yet, probably stars, er sumthin........)
Just make sure you get all the rocks out of the way first Mikey ... hehehehe .. and as far as this goes .. I still don't understand why someone would get all up in arms about someone NOT following to close and cursingsomeone outfor it .. don't mean to be rude here or nothing but I just don't see the logic in it.
Well, the only theory I can formulate that makes sense, is that because they Civic cut him off, he didn't do it intentionally and didn't see the Hummer. When he looked back in his mirror, he saw the Hummer on his ***, and assumed he came up on his bumper really close after he pulled out of the lot. That would explain why he was pissed off. If that's what happened, then B should have been the pissed off one, since they guy didn't even bother looking before he pulled out of the lot.
We don't know what the hell happened in that man's mind, so whatever. It was a fun debate while it lasted. Just don't think I am against expressing opinions. You know I'm all for it, good OR bad. That's the point of a forum isn't it?
Ipersonally don't think anything should be deleted from this forum, or modified, unless it's threatening in anyway. But, that's just me. Unfortunately, it happens.
OK Now I'm going off in another tangent. Damn I need some ridilin!!
We don't know what the hell happened in that man's mind, so whatever. It was a fun debate while it lasted. Just don't think I am against expressing opinions. You know I'm all for it, good OR bad. That's the point of a forum isn't it?
Ipersonally don't think anything should be deleted from this forum, or modified, unless it's threatening in anyway. But, that's just me. Unfortunately, it happens.
OK Now I'm going off in another tangent. Damn I need some ridilin!!


