View Poll Results: A poll

2003 - with 31,242 miles

81.25%

2005 - with 64,234 miles

18.75%

Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

H2 - 2003 vs 2005

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

#21

04-08-2008, 02:14 PM

Thread Starter

Join Date: Mar 2008

Posts: 8

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

Thanks all for kind replys I think I'm readdy to pull teh trigger.

#22

04-08-2008, 05:32 PM

Muddydawg75

Super Moderator

Join Date: Mar 2007

Location: Red Lion, PA

Posts: 11,001

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

Post pictures when you get it, please...

#23

04-08-2008, 06:43 PM

3hummers

Super Moderator

Join Date: Sep 2007

Location:

Posts: 14,901

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

Good luck.

#24

04-09-2008, 02:17 AM

HummBob

Senior Member

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 16,711

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

Let us KNOW!!!

#25

04-09-2008, 03:16 PM

Greenblade

Join Date: Mar 2006

Location:

Posts: 649

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

I voted '05 because generally the first model year of any vehicle is more prone to problems, and I think the all-black interior was new for '05 (I have it in my '06) and I enjoy that a bit mroe than some of the earlier dashes

#26

04-09-2008, 03:27 PM

Muddydawg75

Super Moderator

Join Date: Mar 2007

Location: Red Lion, PA

Posts: 11,001

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

I don't know of any 1st year model issues with mine.... other than the mirrors... which also includes 05's...

#27

04-09-2008, 07:14 PM

3hummers

Super Moderator

Join Date: Sep 2007

Location:

Posts: 14,901

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

My 2003 was one of the most trouble free vehicles I have ever owned. I was told the reason they were so hard to get early was that they were watching the quality control very closely. I had several friends with 03 H2s and they all had similiar experiences.