View Poll Results: A poll

2003 - with 31,242 miles

81.25%

2005 - with 64,234 miles

18.75%

Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

H2 - 2003 vs 2005

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 8, 2008 | 02:14 PM

#21

Thread Starter

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts: 8

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

Thanks all for kind replys I think I'm readdy to pull teh trigger.

Apr 8, 2008 | 05:32 PM

#22

Muddydawg75

Super Moderator

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 11,001

From: Red Lion, PA

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

Post pictures when you get it, please...

Apr 8, 2008 | 06:43 PM

#23

3hummers

Super Moderator

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 15,028

From:

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

Good luck.

Apr 9, 2008 | 02:17 AM

#24

HummBob

Senior Member

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 16,711

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

Let us KNOW!!!

Apr 9, 2008 | 03:16 PM

#25

Greenblade

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 649

From:

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

I voted '05 because generally the first model year of any vehicle is more prone to problems, and I think the all-black interior was new for '05 (I have it in my '06) and I enjoy that a bit mroe than some of the earlier dashes

Apr 9, 2008 | 03:27 PM

#26

Muddydawg75

Super Moderator

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 11,001

From: Red Lion, PA

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

I don't know of any 1st year model issues with mine.... other than the mirrors... which also includes 05's...

Apr 9, 2008 | 07:14 PM

#27

3hummers

Super Moderator

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 15,028

From:

RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005

My 2003 was one of the most trouble free vehicles I have ever owned. I was told the reason they were so hard to get early was that they were watching the quality control very closely. I had several friends with 03 H2s and they all had similiar experiences.