Caddy

 

They both look nice to me..soooooo...buy both.

 

If i had 180,000 I would but I cant

 

wow..didn't realize they were that much.

 

Id go with the range rover sport, Where did you get 180 thousand from you blew these numbers up quite a bit. Range rovers just have things that the escalade simply just doesnt.

 

Yea, like escalated repair cost (no pun intended ). They and most foriegn cars are outragous to fix and they aren't set up for you to do it yourself either. We had a Mercedes ML 320 and that damned thing killed me every time we had to get the brakes changed or new tires. God forbid you own it after the warranty expires, it was $500 JUST to take in to the shop. That's the one big thing that will always turn me away from them from now on. I've owned Mercedes (ML 320), BMW (525i), Dodge (Durango Limited, yea, it had a hemi),GM H3's (no ford) and just because it has a foriegn tag on it doesn't make it better or more lux IMO. You really need to go drive them both and buy what feels right to you. I wouldn't have listened to anyone about it before my exp, but I won't buy another foriegn car.

 

We have the Escalade!!! GET IT!!!

It is REALLY NICE!!! Fit and finish is SUPERB plus there was some cool CHROME I could add!!

 

Okay, I did blow up the numbers but at the dealer an escalade costs 60k+ and a Land Rover Range Rover can go from 60k to 80k

 

Yea I was looking at the Range Rover Sport at the dealership but I went with the LR3 HSE instead. I kinda regret not going with the sport but at the same time im happy with the LR3

 

I'm plannig on going big with this car and i want something that I can go to a car show with to display....screw this I'll get one of these, my dealer offered me one when i said i was buying...$450,000