Hummer H2 For those who like a little more gleam to their Hummer, the H2 offers a similar rugged look as the H1, but as a lower cost, and with more added features, making it almost a massive luxury SUV.

OBD2 Port Not Communicating with Scanner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2019 | 02:29 PM
  #21  
ZackMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by MixManSC
On that vein I have seen similar problems with certain aftermarket devices too. I remember a remote start that I had on one truck that while functioning just fine, put so much noise and chatter on the data bus that no scanner could be used until it was first disconnected.
That's interesting.
 
Old Oct 19, 2019 | 01:54 PM
  #22  
oceanbrave's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,635
From: Birmingham (UK)
Default

Any update?
 
Old Oct 19, 2019 | 04:19 PM
  #23  
ZackMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by oceanbrave
Any update?
I have not progressed any; however, I plan on using a lab scope to perform further diagnostics. I will update the forum once I complete this process.

Stay tuned.
 
Old Oct 19, 2019 | 04:48 PM
  #24  
bronxteck's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 3,206
From: BX NY North East
Default

well if you use a 2 channel scope set one channel to the positive data channel of the module you are troubleshooting and the second channel to the negative data channel. the wave form should mirror each other as in opposites if they don't then you need to dig deeper into that module and its connected accessories.
 
Old Oct 19, 2019 | 05:07 PM
  #25  
ZackMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by bronxteck
well if you use a 2 channel scope set one channel to the positive data channel of the module you are troubleshooting and the second channel to the negative data channel. the wave form should mirror each other as in opposites if they don't then you need to dig deeper into that module and its connected accessories.
I will be using a one-channel scope, break-out-box and a fused jumper wire. Once I access Splice Pack 205 to start with I hope to find the anomaly. If it does not exist by isolating each pin that is being used further analysis will be necessary.
 
Old Oct 19, 2019 | 05:34 PM
  #26  
bronxteck's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 3,206
From: BX NY North East
Default

well you can do the procedure with a 1 channel the signals should still mirror each other on the positive and negative bus. just not as convenient to visualize as when both are on screen to look for any nuances between them.
 
Old Oct 19, 2019 | 05:35 PM
  #27  
hummerz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 9,017
From: C-Town
Default

Or you can simply pull fuses until the scanner communicates.
 
Old Oct 19, 2019 | 06:12 PM
  #28  
ZackMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 21
Default

bronxtek and hummerz,

Your input is invaluable. Thanks!
 
Old Oct 19, 2019 | 07:04 PM
  #29  
oceanbrave's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,635
From: Birmingham (UK)
Default

ZackMan

Guess its possible that a module is corrupting data comms, but surely you would have seen some issues in your vehicle, so it still doesn't make sense.

One thing you could do is buzz-out the cable on the TECH2 itself, I've buzzed my cable and sketched the pinout (see attached PDF)

It wouldnt take long to check.

Also if you power-up the TECH2 on the bench, go to say "F2 Chassis"->"F1 Air Suspension"->"F1 Data Display" and check the signal on Pin2 (Data) and Pin 4 or 5 (GND) you should get something similar to that shown below. This signal looks a bit poor as its un-terminated but at least it would prove-out the TECH2 comms side and its easier than accessing SP205.


 
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Tech2 DLC Cable.pdf (227.4 KB, 156 views)
Old Oct 19, 2019 | 08:13 PM
  #30  
ZackMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 21
Default

oceanbrave,

This is great information; however, I need clarification. What do you mean by “buzz-out” the cable on the Tech2? Since you attached the .pdf with the two sketches, I presume the second sketch, which is applicable to my situation, would accept bench power at pins 16 and 4 or 5.

I would then probe either pins 4 or 5 to obtain a waveform. Am I understanding this correctly?

Please educate this wayward soul.

By the way, thanks again.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.