inked
Posts: 252
Joined: 5/26/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Linus Gump How much of your carnage would you say is from the lift/ bigger tires, and how much is from off road usage? I only have my torsion bars turned 2.5 turns compared to your lift, and I have stock sized tires on the stock rims, but a more aggrssive tread. I'm pretty sure my busted half shaft was from off road usage, but then it was the one that had a torn boot earlier, and it was that joint that failed. I foresaw the halfshafts as being a weak link when I bought it, the Hummvees have the same problem, and judging by the diameter of the tierod, that looks like a weak link as well. I bought my H3 with the intent to wheel it, so the breakage is expected, but it would be nice to know what the limitations are before I am broken somewhere without the tools or parts to fix it. Since you have broken both of these now, I am curious how your modifications have influanced these failures. The broken alternator and battery was due to mud damage, and the broken shock bushings was due to some rough riding - this was all stock. The CV Shaft broke after I got the lift but heard of stories where H3's busted their shaft just turning on ice with no lift, or tbars cranked. Same goes with the tierod, heard of stories on other Hummer sites where the tierod snapped on both stock H3's and H2's. So technically I can't blame the lift, although by just looking at it the large tires does max out the CV Shaft, and the tie rods do suck. So who's to blame? I would say GM, should've built the suspension with the idea that there are some of us who bought it to wheel it HARD, brakage is a part of wheeling but those thin-ass tierods is nothing but bad engineering.
< Message edited by inked -- 4/18/2007 4:14:08 PM >
_____________________________
....................................................... 4X4BOYZ.COM - "Get it Dirty!"
|