|
Greenblade -> RE: hummer offroad capability (hummer -v- jeep, etc.) (4/6/2006 2:08:35 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: shortbus i don't think you can compare the H2 to a jeep. there are things that one can do and the other can't. short wheel base vs. long wheel base, 7000 lbs vs 2500 lbs, 5ft wide vs 6.5 ft wide. i think the majority of the die hard jeep fans simply haven't seen an H2 offroad, therefore they rag on it. the majority of H2 owners don't want to bang up a $60k vehicle, or even get it dirty. i got compliments from jeepers for taking mine off the pavement within a week of buying it, and that was AFTER 2 toyotas pulled my stuck a$$ out of the mud (the weight causes you to sink really quickly, and it doesn't respond like a 4runner). i wouldn't trade mine for a jeep, but i've thought about adding an old beater to the fleet. if i could add my old 4runner, i'd be happier than a pig in sh, er, mud (i love mud). you can say it's jealousy, or envy, or someone with a lot of experience realizing what can't be done and focusing on that. i say let 'em talk, after all, that's all it is. if you want to really compare jeeps to hummers, the best argument would be for an H3, it's closest in size and weight. otherwise, it's all apples and oranges; both are tasty and have a place at the table. hey, thanks for the feedback. I can see the point, and i suspect that the H2 doesn't have all that much of an advantage over most pickups for most realistic off-roading situations. I base that on, while the Jeep my family had as i was growing up was bad, any 4wd full size truck never had an issue with any of the tasks the farm/ranch called for. In a way i wonder if the advantage of the humm is just being less damage-prone with the different approach angles (correct term?) and shielding underneath. My '05 silverado 2500 doesn't have much less ground clearance, and drives as high. The larger tires of teh h2 aren't necessarily a plus in all situations (snow with hard road reachable somewhere underneath comes to mind). with respect to challenging-terrain capacity, and the (rare?) actual need for the same... the best car i've ever had on ice was a nissan Z with blizzak on all 4 wheels. that thing could accelerate fairly hard in conditions that would require 4wd of the silverado to even move. before teh blizzak it was so bad it routinely got stuck on the streetside or in a parking lot - and not in snow, just on frozen surfaces, couldn't move. After the tires, i've never had a car remotely like it. I suspect the h2 won't match that with its stock tires, either. but ice is ice, and zero traction on 4 wheels is about the same as zero traction on 2 wheels. But whatever the case, i do hope to learn a bit about driving the humm in its designed role. I'm thinking about hitting the hummer course in indiana this summer... G PS: you said "you can say it's jealousy, or envy, or someone with a lot of experience realizing what can't be done and focusing on that", and i guess i base my shock value/jealousy/symbolism/wahtever on logic i offered in another thread yesterday morning: the commonly given reasons for hummer-hate don't hold water. The mileage? it's not that bad in the grand scheme. The grocery-getter suburban-mom picking up the kids? I checked for web sites devoted to hating souped-up sports cars, like my old 423hp (at the back wheels) '94 300zx, and there's nothing. How many times did i send that thing to its performance limits? probably twice. and it got about 13-15 aroudn town (-vs- 11.5 on the first tank in the h2). t-tops open crusing car is all it was to me, save the two times i took it to a track to run a 1/4 and all. and that's what those things do better than anything (i mean that), anyway - the 91+ 300's are the ultimate sports car for balance of speed, handling, and enjoyability-via-not-beating-you-up (IMO of course). I guess my logic (however simplistic) is just that if the reasons make no sense, there isn't a rational reason, then the reason behind the hat
|
|
|
|