|
HummerGuy -> RE: Questions (7/8/2008 8:31:04 AM)
|
We (my wife and I) bought our H3 for two main reasons; A) Where we live, the streets are rarely plowed and cars slide all over the place in the winters, not to mention the flooding B) We wanted to try out the off-roading culture and use it to take road trips because of that. We traded our Scion xB for the vehicle. The H3 gets better mileage then most comparible SUV''''s out there. There are many of the forementioned vehicles that get worse mileage, ie; sports cars. Nobody has ever attacked them nearly as much as Hummers. I believe people attack the Hummer brand because it is a consolidated brand line and easy to do so as opposed to saying "The Escalade, Tahoe, Silverado, Ridgeline, Explorer, Expedition and all those cars kill the environment" Why not just make it EASY on yourself and say "Hummers kill the environment" and group every bad thing about SUV''''s into one consolidated brand that everybody knows and is easily recognizable. Before Hummer made a name for itself in the mainstream market, people just referred to all SUV''''s as being gas-guzzlers and polluting machines. Now adays, people find it easier to say the word "Hummer" and all hell breaks loose. Most of these people don''''t know anything technical about the vehicles, but since it''''s so easy to do, they choose the easy, uneducated route. My H3 gets between 20 to 23 MPGs consistantly on the highway because I simply changed my driving patterns and got a few minor upgrades. I can''''t speak for the H2 owners, but us H3 owners more-so seem to buy the vehicle for safety, off-roading and weather conditions then anything. I personally have rarely met an H3 owner that bought their truck just to drive around the street and look pretty. Some people do and some don''''t. That doesn''''t necessarily mean I agree with it, but I''''m not going to publically denounce it. The ironic thing about the entire negative Hummer stereotype is that for decades there have been far worse polluting vehicles out there, including today, that are causing and contributing more then our vehicles. And how about other vehicles that cause pollution and aren''''t regulated to our vehicles extent, like train locomotives, semi trucks, farm tractors, coal factories, oil refineries, Nascar and Indy car racing, motorcycles, lawn mowers, RV''''s, ATV''''s, contruction bulldozers, cranes, public busses, BOATS, Cruise Ships, wave runners, jet skis, snow mobiles, Go-Carts, etc. How many of those above items are luxury items? How many of us Hummer owners use our vehicles every day for practical purposes? There are SO many things in this world that contribute to pollution and as a whole, I would bet Hummers contribute a very small amount of pollution compared to all of those vehicles and engines I mentioned above. How about the BIG one? Airline jets. How often do you hear people protesting their pollution levels? You don''''t, and you know why, because people fly in planes more then they drive Hummers. It''''s a complete hypocracy in the Hummer-bashing world. Plain and simple? We are EASY targets. There is no effort involved in research because everybody knows that Hummers are bad, right? [8|] Don''''t worry, I''''m not upset. I''''m just stating my case. [:)] I won''''t even get into how damaging the metals are in Hybrids in the long-run to our environment.
|
|
|
|