H2 - 2003 vs 2005
|
[Poll]
|
H2 - 2003 vs 2005
|
| 2003 - with 31,242 miles |
|
| 2005 - with 64,234 miles |
|
Total Votes : 16
|
(last vote on : 4/14/2008 8:46:49 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
|
|
Login  | |
|
H2 - 2003 vs 2005 - 4/6/2008 9:44:11 AM
|
|
|
gp
Posts: 8
Joined: 3/28/2008
Status: offline
|
I have an oportunity to purchase on of the following vehicles...
What would be your choice 2005 with more miles or 2003 with less miles.
Bout vehicles are same configuration and same price just one is older then other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005 - 4/6/2008 10:17:35 AM
|
|
|
3hummers
Posts: 11756
Joined: 9/23/2007
Status: offline
|
I would do the 03. My 2003 was an almost perfect vehicle.
_____________________________
2006 H1 Alpha wagon
2000 H1 Slantback
1997 H1 wagon
2008 H3 Alpha
|
|
|
|
|
RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005 - 4/6/2008 10:34:04 AM
|
|
|
Muddydawg75
Posts: 9955
Joined: 3/11/2007
From: South Jersey Shore
Status: offline
|
03.... especially if it happens to be Birch White...
_____________________________
Graphics by HUMMER DRIVER
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day." --Frank Sinatra
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005 - 4/6/2008 8:17:47 PM
|
|
|
3hummers
Posts: 11756
Joined: 9/23/2007
Status: offline
|
The 2 that voted for the 05 apparently want to stay anonymous.
_____________________________
2006 H1 Alpha wagon
2000 H1 Slantback
1997 H1 wagon
2008 H3 Alpha
|
|
|
|
|
RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005 - 4/6/2008 8:37:20 PM
|
|
|
rhill20
Posts: 4548
Joined: 10/27/2007
From: Delaware, Ohio GO BUCKS!
Status: offline
|
If it is the same price for both then it's a no brainer, go for the low milage. Resale isn't enough of a difference to worry about the year.
Kelly blue book suggested retail value with the milage that you listed: (I looked these up with base model configurations, just a side by side comparison for you)
2003 with 31,242 miles = $30,240
2005 with 64,234 miles = $30,515
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: H2 - 2003 vs 2005 - 4/6/2008 9:27:36 PM
|
|
|
gp
Posts: 8
Joined: 3/28/2008
Status: offline
|
I checked up 2003 on Saturday, that vehicle is in perfect condition outside, no scratches on paint of any kind, the only what worries me a little bit is that there is some rust on the bolts when you look behind the tires, and little on chaises also behind tires. Also "door-step" witch I assume is additional equipment is also rusted somewhat. I'm not to worried about step because I can imagine that is replicable or easily fixable. 2005 I havn't had a chance to check up yet, but do you guys thinks that this corosion is OK, or is it fixable?
P.S. rhill20 thank you for compereson, that was awsome, I got better deal then KBB shows witch is good to know.
< Message edited by gp -- 4/6/2008 9:37:55 PM >
|
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
