We need more ranks

Ive noticed that people with 3000 posts have the same rank as someone with 100 posts I think we can get more creative and add more rankings

well, once aposter gets on the top ten list we vote on a new name for that person.....so be nice to us and start posting

lol but i think we should work on something til one makes it to the top 10 list

Anyone catches Hummbob, they can make the rules.

hey  am I close  --- hahaha

Guess we will all to to start playing the question, rhyme, next letter, ? games to even make a dent in the posting standings. LOL

quote:

ORIGINAL: blackstangs281

Anyone catches Hummbob, they can make the rules.

 
I dunno.....Muddy's on FIRE!!!!!

i would have liked to see something else.........but what do i know.....im moosenubs

I'm trying to get into the top ten but I'm only 800 posts away.

You guys make suggestions and we can change them...at least I can ask Patrick to change them....it's up to the peeps!!

well  now i have  a long way to go!!!!!!!!!!
 

Trey that is a moving 800. I think those guys are pulling away faster than I can post. LOL. Oh well I can always aspire......

My goal was to catch Shorty by Jan 1st....
 
that was 2000 posts ago...

C'mon you can do it your only like 1700 away from the top ten....lol.

I do think the idea of more ranks is something to discuss a little more...
 
maybe a few more auto ranks.... but a few more staff selected would be fun...

quote:

ORIGINAL: vilim12

lol but i think we should work on something til one makes it to the top 10 list

 
 
 
OK..............you're a Corporal.  Go clean the mess hall with some newbs (PFCs) and report back when it shines.     

anyone under 200 just ain't worth my time
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Damn Impy, do we at least get "a look" if we are over 200?

rhill, we are like the bellmen at the hotel. We don't have to change sheets or wash dishes but aren't management either. LOL

At the risk of going all --IK-- on this subject, I offer the following opinion:

Ranks and posting positions really don't count for much any more. With the advent of all these
padding games, any FNG with a dictionary, a thesaurus and a link to word of the day, can hit a grand in a month.
Whatever air of legitimacy those numbers once lent to a member, it is now long gone.

Maybe it is time to use length of "active" membership as a new criteria for bestowing rank/names.

Just a thought.

NOTE: I'm not trying to frag anyone here. Those games are enjoyed by many folks and do serve
a purpose of sorts. Especially when things get slow....Just expressing an opinion (stinky as it may be).


Plus it gave me a chance to use my newly coined phrase: "Going IK on it".....

quote:

ORIGINAL: 3hummers

rhill, we are like the bellmen at the hotel. We don't have to change sheets or wash dishes but aren't management either. LOL

 
That sounds alot like my job now!

I'd rather post 100 in the games than 100 saying use the search engine....

for what that is worth.

It doesn't matter to me if you post 100 in a month or 1000 in 3 years.  If you are active and participate then you are doing your part for the greater good of the forum.

I don't do the games and I don't feel like I am in competition with anyone here on the post score. With very few exceptions I enjoy the people on the forum, reading the posts and commenting sometimes. Generally a great group of guys ( with the afore noted exceptions ) and gals. Some forums are near death they are so inactive and others are run by real ****weeds. Thanks for keeping the forum a great place to hang out with like minded people.

You don't see any posts by me in the gamer threads.  Sorry, not my bag. 
 
Those who enjoy them, carry on. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: Doc Olds

You don't see any posts by me in the gamer threads.  Sorry, not my bag. 

Those who enjoy them, carry on. 

 
Tried a couple of them myself. Just did'nt do anything for me.